US20040131870A1 - Compositions and methods for inhibiting protein on surfaces - Google Patents
Compositions and methods for inhibiting protein on surfaces Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20040131870A1 US20040131870A1 US10/732,934 US73293403A US2004131870A1 US 20040131870 A1 US20040131870 A1 US 20040131870A1 US 73293403 A US73293403 A US 73293403A US 2004131870 A1 US2004131870 A1 US 2004131870A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- polymers
- nipam
- lenses
- lens
- protein
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- CEWKVGUXGQMTRK-UHFFFAOYSA-N C.C.CCC(C)C(=O)NC(C)C Chemical compound C.C.CCC(C)C(=O)NC(C)C CEWKVGUXGQMTRK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- NWDXPPHUNCPBLJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N CC(C)CCC(C)NC(=N)NC(=N)NCCCN(C)C.Cl.Cl.Cl Chemical compound CC(C)CCC(C)NC(=N)NC(=N)NCCCN(C)C.Cl.Cl.Cl NWDXPPHUNCPBLJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L12/00—Methods or apparatus for disinfecting or sterilising contact lenses; Accessories therefor
- A61L12/08—Methods or apparatus for disinfecting or sterilising contact lenses; Accessories therefor using chemical substances
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L27/00—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
- A61L27/28—Materials for coating prostheses
- A61L27/34—Macromolecular materials
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L12/00—Methods or apparatus for disinfecting or sterilising contact lenses; Accessories therefor
- A61L12/08—Methods or apparatus for disinfecting or sterilising contact lenses; Accessories therefor using chemical substances
- A61L12/14—Organic compounds not covered by groups A61L12/10 or A61L12/12
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L12/00—Methods or apparatus for disinfecting or sterilising contact lenses; Accessories therefor
- A61L12/08—Methods or apparatus for disinfecting or sterilising contact lenses; Accessories therefor using chemical substances
- A61L12/14—Organic compounds not covered by groups A61L12/10 or A61L12/12
- A61L12/141—Biguanides, e.g. chlorhexidine
- A61L12/142—Polymeric biguanides
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L12/00—Methods or apparatus for disinfecting or sterilising contact lenses; Accessories therefor
- A61L12/08—Methods or apparatus for disinfecting or sterilising contact lenses; Accessories therefor using chemical substances
- A61L12/14—Organic compounds not covered by groups A61L12/10 or A61L12/12
- A61L12/143—Quaternary ammonium compounds
- A61L12/145—Polymeric quaternary ammonium compounds
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L31/00—Materials for other surgical articles, e.g. stents, stent-grafts, shunts, surgical drapes, guide wires, materials for adhesion prevention, occluding devices, surgical gloves, tissue fixation devices
- A61L31/08—Materials for coatings
- A61L31/10—Macromolecular materials
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
- C11D3/00—Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
- C11D3/0005—Other compounding ingredients characterised by their effect
- C11D3/0078—Compositions for cleaning contact lenses, spectacles or lenses
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
- C11D3/00—Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
- C11D3/16—Organic compounds
- C11D3/37—Polymers
- C11D3/3703—Macromolecular compounds obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
- C11D3/3719—Polyamides or polyimides
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
- C11D3/00—Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
- C11D3/16—Organic compounds
- C11D3/37—Polymers
- C11D3/3746—Macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
- C11D3/3769—(Co)polymerised monomers containing nitrogen, e.g. carbonamides, nitriles or amines
- C11D3/3773—(Co)polymerised monomers containing nitrogen, e.g. carbonamides, nitriles or amines in liquid compositions
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T428/00—Stock material or miscellaneous articles
- Y10T428/31504—Composite [nonstructural laminate]
- Y10T428/31725—Of polyamide
Definitions
- the present invention is directed to the reduction of protein deposition on surfaces.
- the invention provides compositions and methods for inhibiting the deposition of protein on the surfaces of medical devices, particularly biomedical and prosthetic devices.
- the invention is based on the discovery that certain polymers and related copolymers comprising the monomer n-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM) significantly inhibit protein deposition on the surfaces of contact lenses.
- NIPAM monomer n-isopropylacrylamide
- NIPAM-containing polymers could be used to modify the surfaces of medical devices, such as contact lenses, and to control protein deposition and release on such surfaces.
- the terms “soft” and “hard” relative to contact lenses are generally associated with not only the relative hardness of the respective types of lenses, but also the type of polymeric material from which the lenses are formed.
- the term “soft” generally denotes a contact lens that is formed from a hydrophilic polymeric material, such as hydroxyethyl methacrylate or “HEMA”, while the term “hard” generally denotes a lens that is formed from a hydrophobic polymeric material, such as polymethylmethacrylate or “PMMA”.
- HEMA hydroxyethyl methacrylate
- PMMA polymethylmethacrylate
- the ionic surfaces and porous nature of soft contact lenses can lead to significant problems when the lenses come into contact with the tear film due to the complex composition of the tear film, which is largely comprised of proteins, lipids, enzymes and various electrolytes. Tear components include albumin, lactoferrin, lysozyme and a number of immunoglobulins. The uptake of proteins from the tear fluid onto the lens is a common problem and depends on a number of factors, including the nature of the materials from which the lens is made.
- Soft contact lenses act as efficient substrates for protein deposition and adsorption. This fouling can lead to dehydration of the lens and instability of the tear film, resulting in discomfort and lack of tolerance in the wearer. Adsorption of proteins can also facilitate bacterial colonization and this can increase the risk of vision-threatening infections.
- contact lens cleaning must be a regular part of a patient's lens care regimen.
- cleaning agents such as surfactants and enzymes are typically incorporated into contact lens care products to remove protein deposits.
- the use of these agents can lead to irritation, and in cases where rubbing and cleaning regimens are required, there is a possibility that the cleaning agents will not be used properly or will be used in a manner that damages the lenses.
- the surfaces of contact lenses could be modified so as to prevent or reduce the adsorption of proteins to the surfaces.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,411,932 describes the use of polymeric alcohols and polymeric ethers, including poly(ethylene glycol), polyethylene oxide and polyethylene glycol methyl ether, as prophylactic agents against soilant deposits on contact lenses;
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,274,133 (Hu et al.) describes the use of cationic cellulose polymers to prevent the build-up of lipids and proteins on a silicone-hydrogel lens;
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,096,138 (Heiler, et al.) describes the use of polyquaternium polymers such as Luviquate (BASF), which is a mixture of vinylpyrrolidone and vinylimidazolium moieties that can bind to hydrophilic contact lens materials, so as to block the binding of proteinaceous materials to the lenses.
- BASF Luviquate
- the present invention is directed to the use of polymers that are surface active and exhibit a temperature response in aqueous solutions.
- the polymers and related polymers e.g., co-polymers
- NIPAM N-isopropylacrylamide
- the present invention is based on a discovery that the NIPAM polymers and related polymers may be utilized to inhibit protein deposition on the surfaces of hydrogel contact lenses.
- the NIPAM polymers provide unique solution properties, and it has been discovered that these properties can be employed in formulations where protein resistant hydrogel surfaces are desired.
- the present invention is based on a discovery that the NIPAM polymers described herein are uniquely suited for this purpose.
- the NIPAM polymers described herein may be employed in various manners in order to achieve modification of contact lens surfaces and surfaces of other medical devices.
- contact lenses can be stored in solutions containing NIPAM polymers prior to being worn. This prophylactic approach allows the polymers to form a protective layer on the surface of the lenses before the consumer even exposes the lenses to tear fluids containing protein.
- the NIPAM polymers may also be incorporated in multi-purpose solutions for treating contact lenses on a daily basis. Chemical grafting on surfaces to form permanent coatings of NIPAM polymers is another method for preparing protein resistant surfaces.
- the surface modification techniques described herein may be applied to various medical devices where protein resistant surfaces are desired, such as intraocular lenses, catheters, cardiac stents, prosthetics, and other medical devices that undergo prolonged exposure to proteins during use in or on the bodies of humans or other mammals.
- NIPAM polymers described herein have a range of inherent physical properties (e.g., low interfacial free energy, hydrophilic-hydrophobic properties, very low toxicity, dynamic surface mobility and steric stabilization) that enable these polymers to exhibit superior protein inhibiting characteristics.
- FIG. 1 is a graph showing the results of the tests described in Example 1.
- FIG. 2 is a graph showing the results of the tests described in Example 3.
- NIPAM polymers utilized in the present invention have the following formula:
- n is a whole number of from 10 to 3,000.
- the NIPAM polymers utilized in the present invention include various types of polymers that comprise the above-described monomer.
- the polymers may be formed entirely from the NIPAM monomer identified above, or other monomers can be incorporated into the polymer by copolymerizing the NIPAM monomer with other monomers, such as acrylic acid, acrylamide, N-acetylacylamide, N, N-dimethylacrylamide and butyl methacrylate.
- modified polymers or copolymers containing the NIPAM monomer can be prepared by functionalization of end groups, preparation of block copolymers, and cross-linking of polymers.
- NIPAM polymers All such polymers, copolymers or modifications thereof are referred to herein as either “NIPAM polymers” or “PNIPAM”.
- the NIPAM polymers utilized in the present invention will typically have molecular weights of from 1,000 to 300,000 Daltons. The polymers are available from Polymer Source, Inc., Dorval, Quebec (Canada).
- the amount of PNIPAM utilized in the compositions of the present invention will vary depending on the form of the compositions and the intended use thereof.
- the concentration of PNIPAM utilized will generally be an amount sufficient to obtain a solution surface tension of less than 50 milliNewtons per meter (“mNm ⁇ 1 ”) at room temperature (23° C.).
- NIPAM polymers are surface active, and therefore will readily adsorb to most types of surfaces. Factors such as the type of surface (hydrophobic versus hydrophilic), temperature, buffer and excipients will influence the interaction between the polymers and a surface, and will influence the magnitude of the interactions.
- PNIPAM polymers may be combined with other components commonly utilized in products for treating contact lenses, such as rheology modifiers, enzymes, antimicrobial agents, surfactants, chelating agents or combinations thereof.
- the preferred surfactants include anionic surfactants, such as RLM 100, and nonionic surfactants, such as the poloxamines available under the name “Tetronic®”, and the poloxamers available under the name “Pluronic®”.
- a variety of buffering agents may be added, such as sodium borate, boric acid, sodium citrate, citric acid, sodium bicarbonate, phosphate buffers and combinations thereof.
- compositions of the present invention that are intended for use as CLC products will contain one or more ophthalmically acceptable antimicrobial agents in an amount effective to prevent microbial contamination of the compositions (referred to herein as “an amount effective to preserve”), or in an amount effective to disinfect contact lenses by substantially reducing the number of viable microorganisms present on the lenses (referred to herein as “an amount effective to disinfect”).
- antimicrobial agents include: chlorhexidine, polyhexamethylene biguanide polymers (“PHMB”), polyquaternium-1, and the amino biguanides described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/581,952 and corresponding International (PCT) Publication No. WO 99/32158, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated in the present specification by reference.
- PHMB polyhexamethylene biguanide polymers
- PCT International
- the preferred antimicrobial agents are polyquaternium-1, and amino biguanides of the type described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/581,952 and corresponding International (PCT) Publication No. WO 99/32158.
- the most preferred amino biguanide is identified in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/581,952 as “Compound Number 1”. This compound has the following structure:
- the ophthalmic compositions of the present invention will generally be formulated as sterile aqueous solutions.
- the compositions must be formulated so as to be compatible with ophthalmic tissues and contact lens materials.
- the compositions will generally have an osmolality of from about 200 to about 400 milliosmoles/kilogram water (“mOsm/kg”) and a physiologically compatible pH.
- compositions of the present invention and the ability of those compositions to reduce protein adsorption on contact lenses are further illustrated by the following Examples.
- Unmodified (i.e., non-ionic) NIPAM polymers and modified (i.e., end terminated with —COOH groups) NIPAM polymers were added to appropriately buffered solutions to demonstrate the ability of these polymers to reduce protein adsorption when utilized as components of buffered multi-purpose solutions for treating contact lenses.
- a simple means of producing PNIPAM-modified surfaces was used in order to mimic the contact lens disinfection/cleaning regime typically used by the consumer.
- NIPAM polymers utilized are identified in Table 1 below. These polymers were purchased from Polymer Source Inc. and were used without further purification. TABLE 1 Polymer Type M v ⁇ 10 3 M w /M n P2991-NIPAM Non-ionic 46,380 2.36 P604-NIPAM Non-ionic 71,600 2.44 P1239-NIPAM Non-ionic 122,000 2.50 P2426F2-NIPAM- Anionic 132,000 1.29 COOH
- Acuvue (Vistakon, a division of Johnson & Johnson Vision Products, Inc) lenses were used as the substrate in this study.
- the lenses had the following parameters: 42% etafilcon A, 58% water, FDA Group IV lens. Diameter, 14.0 mm; base curve, 8.8 mm; power, ⁇ 2.00.
- NIPAM and NIPAM-COOH polymers identified in Table 1 were formulated at pH 7.8 in a buffered vehicle containing 1.5% sorbitol, 0.6% boric acid and 0.32% NaCl. In a beaker, all the formulation chemicals except for the NIPAM polymers were weighed out and purified water was added (QS to 95%). The pH was adjusted to 7.8 with NaOH/HCl. The NIPAM polymer was weighed out and added to the buffer solution and this was stirred overnight to solubilize the polymer.
- test formulations are shown in Table 2 below; the concentrations are expressed as weight/volume percent (“w/v%”): TABLE 2 Formulation Numbers 9591-47C Component 9591-47A 9591-47B (Control) P2991-NIPAM 0.034 0.017 — Sorbitol 1.5 1.5 1.5 Boric Acid 0.6 0.6 0.6 Sodium Chloride 0.32 0.32 0.32 Purified Water QS QS QS pH 7.8 7.8 7.8
- test formulations were evaluated for their prophylaxis behavior using lysozyme as the model protein, as described below.
- Phosphate Buffered Saline 1.311 g of monobasic sodium phosphate (monohydrate), 5.74 g of dibasic sodium phosphate (anhydrous), and 9.0 g of sodium chloride were dissolved in deionized water and the volume was brought to 1000 mL with deionized water, and pH was adjusted (as necessary). The final concentrations of sodium phosphate and sodium chloride were 0.05 M and 0.9%, respectively. The final pH was 7.4.
- a 1.5-mg/mL lysozyme solution was prepared by dissolving 750 mg of lysozyme in 500-mL phosphate buffered saline pH adjusted to 7.4.
- a lens extraction solution was prepared by mixing 1.0 ml of trifluoroacetic acid with 500-mL acetonitrile and 500 ml of deionized water.
- the pH of the solution ranged from 1.5 to 2.0.
- Each lens was immersed in 3-mL of each test formulation and allowed to sit at room temperature overnight. The next morning, the lenses were removed from the test formulations and dabbed lightly on a towel.
- Each presoaked lens was immersed in a Wheaton glass sample vial containing 3-mL of lysozyme solution.
- the vial was closed with a plastic snap cap and incubated in a constant temperature water bath at 37° C. for 24 hours.
- Three additional lenses were included as controls to establish the total amount of lysozyme deposited. After incubation, the deposited lenses were removed from their vials and rinsed by dipping into three consecutive beakers containing 200 ml Unisol®4 or water to remove any excess of the deposition solution.
- the lenses were extracted with 5 ml of ACN/TFA extraction solution in a screw-capped glass scintillation vial.
- the extraction was done by shaking the vial with a rotary shaker (Red Rotor) at room temperature for at least 2 hours (usually overnight).
- Quantitative determination of the lysozyme of the lens extract was carried out using a fluorescence spectrophotometer interfaced with an autosampler and a computer.
- the fluorescence intensity of a 2 ml aliquot from each sample solution was measured by setting the excitation/emission wavelength at 280 nm/346 nm with excitation/emission slits of 2.5 nm/10 nm, respectively, and the sensitivity of the photomultiplier was set at 950 volts.
- a lysozyme standard curve was established by diluting the lysozyme stock solution to concentrations ranging from 0 to 40 ⁇ g/ml, using the ACN/TFA extraction solution for the lens extract and the vehicle for the soaking solutions.
- the instrument settings for measuring the fluorescence intensity were the same for the lens extracts and lens soaking solutions.
- the lysozyme concentrations for all of the samples were calculated based on the slope developed from the linear lysozyme standard curve.
- the % prophylaxis of each formulation was calculated by subtracting the amount of lysozyme in the lens extract from the amount of lysozyme from the control lenses (total deposit), then dividing that by the total deposit and multiplying by 100.
- FIG. 1 shows the % prophylaxis as a function of PNIPAM concentration (g/100 ml) for nonionic NIPAM polymers having molecular weights of 46,380; 71,600; and 122,000, respectively.
- FIG. 1 shows that there was no significant PNIPAM molecular weight dependence on the % prophylaxis using the defined polymer concentrations.
- PNIPAM concentrations up to 0.2 g/100 ml gave % prophylaxis results of approximately 30%.
- the % prophylaxis could be increased to 50% to 60% using polymer concentrations between 0.4 g/100 ml and 0.65 g/100 ml.
- the % prophylaxis was not dependent is on the molecular weight of the NIPAM polymers.
- the prophylactic properties of NIPAM polymers were further evaluated using a 3-day cycling study. Two sets of lenses were prepared. One set was presoaked in the formulations shown in Table 2 before going into the lysozyme solution, whereas the other set was not. Both sets of lenses were then placed in the lysozyme solution for 8 hours (Day 1). At the end of the day all the lenses were rinsed and put in their respective formulations to soak overnight. The following day (Day 2), the lenses went back into the lysozyme for the day (8 hours). This was repeated to complete 3 cycles (3 Days). At the end of the experiment all the lenses were analyzed in accordance with the procedures described in Example 1.
- the buffered solutions containing a NIPAM polymer i.e., P2991-NIPAM
- P2991-NIPAM a NIPAM polymer
- the presoaked lenses treated with solutions containing concentrations of 0.034% and 0.017% of the NIPAM polymer demonstrated prophylaxis values of 67.8% and 60.8%, respectively.
- the prophylaxis values were 45.9% and 41.9% at concentrations of 0.034% and 0.017%, respectively.
- results set forth in Table 3 demonstrate that treatment of the lenses with a NIPAM polymer solution prior to exposure to proteins is preferable. However, the results also show that even when the lenses have already been exposed to proteins prior to an initial treatment with a NIPAM polymer solution, the uptake of protein is reduced when the lenses are subsequently treated with a NIPAM polymer solution. Thus, the results of this study confirm that the compositions of the present invention are effective in reducing the formation of protein deposits on contact lenses, even when the lenses are repeatedly exposed to protein contamination.
- FIG. 2 shows the prophylaxis data obtained using the overnight soak model with lenses pre-soaked in the respective PNIPAM formulations.
- FIG. 2 shows that the prophylaxis properties of the NIPAM polymers were retained in the presence of the antimicrobial agent AL-8496 and other formulation components, including cleaning ingredients (e.g., citrate and Tetronic® 1304).
- cleaning ingredients e.g., citrate and Tetronic® 1304.
- Example 2 The evaluation was carried out using the same procedures as outlined in Example 1.
- the buffered solution utilized as a control (10581-85J) did not exhibit any prophylaxis properties.
- Table 6 the compositions of the present invention containing PNIPAM at concentrations of 0.2% (10581-85B) and 0.4% (10581-85C) produced prophylaxis results of 56.2% and 63%, respectively.
Abstract
The use of NIPAM polymers to prevent or reduce the formation of protein deposits on the surfaces of medical devices is described. The invention is particularly directed to reduction of the adsorption of proteins on surfaces of contact lenses and other medical prosthetics.
Description
- The present invention is directed to the reduction of protein deposition on surfaces. The invention provides compositions and methods for inhibiting the deposition of protein on the surfaces of medical devices, particularly biomedical and prosthetic devices. The invention is based on the discovery that certain polymers and related copolymers comprising the monomer n-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM) significantly inhibit protein deposition on the surfaces of contact lenses.
- Proteins adsorb to almost all surfaces and the minimization or elimination of protein adsorption has been the subject of numerous studies, such as those reported by Lee, et al., inJ. Biomed. Materials Res., vol. 23, pages 351-368 (1989). Sensors, chromatographic supports, immunoassays, membranes for separation, biomedical implants, prosthetic devices (e.g., contact lenses) and many other devices or objects can be adversely affected by protein adsorption. A method and/or means for treating the surfaces of such objects so as to prevent or reduce protein deposition would therefore be quite advantageous.
- The use of NIPAM-containing polymers to modify surfaces and control protein deposition on glass and silicon substrates has been previously described. The following publications provide further background regarding such modifications:
- 1. Kidoki, et al.,Langmuir, 17, pp. 2402-2407 (2001);
- 2. Bohanon, et al.,J. Biomater. Sci. Polymer Edn., Vol. 8, No. 1, pp.19-39 (1996);
- 3. International (PCT) Patent Publication No. WO 02/30571 A2 (Sudor);
- 4. U.S. Pat. No. 6,447,897 (Liang, et al.);
- 5. U.S. Pat. No. 6,270,903 (Feng, et al.); and 6. Huber, et al.,Science, Vol. 301, pp. 352-354, Jul. 18, 2003.
- The above-identified publications do not disclose or suggest that NIPAM-containing polymers could be used to modify the surfaces of medical devices, such as contact lenses, and to control protein deposition and release on such surfaces.
- The terms “soft” and “hard” relative to contact lenses are generally associated with not only the relative hardness of the respective types of lenses, but also the type of polymeric material from which the lenses are formed. The term “soft” generally denotes a contact lens that is formed from a hydrophilic polymeric material, such as hydroxyethyl methacrylate or “HEMA”, while the term “hard” generally denotes a lens that is formed from a hydrophobic polymeric material, such as polymethylmethacrylate or “PMMA”. The surface chemistry and porosity of the hard and soft lenses is quite different. Soft lenses typically contain a large amount of water, are quite porous, and bear ionic charges on the exposed surfaces of the lenses, while hard lenses are considerably less porous and generally do not bear ionic surface charges.
- The ionic surfaces and porous nature of soft contact lenses can lead to significant problems when the lenses come into contact with the tear film due to the complex composition of the tear film, which is largely comprised of proteins, lipids, enzymes and various electrolytes. Tear components include albumin, lactoferrin, lysozyme and a number of immunoglobulins. The uptake of proteins from the tear fluid onto the lens is a common problem and depends on a number of factors, including the nature of the materials from which the lens is made.
- Soft contact lenses act as efficient substrates for protein deposition and adsorption. This fouling can lead to dehydration of the lens and instability of the tear film, resulting in discomfort and lack of tolerance in the wearer. Adsorption of proteins can also facilitate bacterial colonization and this can increase the risk of vision-threatening infections.
- In view of the potential fouling of contact lenses and the problems created by such fouling, as discussed above, it is generally accepted that contact lens cleaning must be a regular part of a patient's lens care regimen. Many different types of cleaning agents have been utilized in the past for this purpose. Cleaning agents such as surfactants and enzymes are typically incorporated into contact lens care products to remove protein deposits. However, the use of these agents can lead to irritation, and in cases where rubbing and cleaning regimens are required, there is a possibility that the cleaning agents will not be used properly or will be used in a manner that damages the lenses. In view of the foregoing problems, it would be advantageous if the surfaces of contact lenses could be modified so as to prevent or reduce the adsorption of proteins to the surfaces.
- Various attempts have been made to reduce protein deposit formation on s contact lenses. The following patents may be referred to for further background regarding such attempts:
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,411,932 describes the use of polymeric alcohols and polymeric ethers, including poly(ethylene glycol), polyethylene oxide and polyethylene glycol methyl ether, as prophylactic agents against soilant deposits on contact lenses;
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,274,133 (Hu et al.) describes the use of cationic cellulose polymers to prevent the build-up of lipids and proteins on a silicone-hydrogel lens;
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,323,165 (Heiler, et al.) describes the use of charged polyquaternium polymers to block the binding of proteins to hydrophilic contact lenses; and
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,096,138 (Heiler, et al.) describes the use of polyquaternium polymers such as Luviquate (BASF), which is a mixture of vinylpyrrolidone and vinylimidazolium moieties that can bind to hydrophilic contact lens materials, so as to block the binding of proteinaceous materials to the lenses.
- These prior attempts to reduce protein binding have drawbacks. For example, cationic polymers may act as irritants upon contact with the eye when utilized at high concentrations. Additionally, due to the positive charge character of these macromolecules, complex formation with anionic surfactants or other components of CLC products may lead to flocculation and phase separation in the formulation, which is a significant problem. Accordingly, there is need for new approaches to provide protein resistant surfaces.
- Due to the trend toward use of extended wear lenses, it would be useful to be able to provide contact lens wearers with a contact lens surface that inhibits adsorption of proteinaceous matter for extended time periods, without compromising the safety of the patient. The polymer should also be compatible in contact lens care solutions when storage, disinfection and/or cleaning are desired by the patient. The present invention is directed to satisfying these needs.
- The present invention is directed to the use of polymers that are surface active and exhibit a temperature response in aqueous solutions. The polymers and related polymers (e.g., co-polymers) are formed from a N-isopropylacrylamide (“NIPAM”) monomer.
- The present invention is based on a discovery that the NIPAM polymers and related polymers may be utilized to inhibit protein deposition on the surfaces of hydrogel contact lenses. The NIPAM polymers provide unique solution properties, and it has been discovered that these properties can be employed in formulations where protein resistant hydrogel surfaces are desired.
- As discussed above, there is a need for improved approaches for modifying the adsorption of proteins on the surfaces of contact lenses. The present invention is based on a discovery that the NIPAM polymers described herein are uniquely suited for this purpose.
- The NIPAM polymers described herein may be employed in various manners in order to achieve modification of contact lens surfaces and surfaces of other medical devices. For example, contact lenses can be stored in solutions containing NIPAM polymers prior to being worn. This prophylactic approach allows the polymers to form a protective layer on the surface of the lenses before the consumer even exposes the lenses to tear fluids containing protein. The NIPAM polymers may also be incorporated in multi-purpose solutions for treating contact lenses on a daily basis. Chemical grafting on surfaces to form permanent coatings of NIPAM polymers is another method for preparing protein resistant surfaces.
- In addition to contact lenses, the surface modification techniques described herein may be applied to various medical devices where protein resistant surfaces are desired, such as intraocular lenses, catheters, cardiac stents, prosthetics, and other medical devices that undergo prolonged exposure to proteins during use in or on the bodies of humans or other mammals.
- Although not wishing to be bound by theory it is believed that the NIPAM polymers described herein have a range of inherent physical properties (e.g., low interfacial free energy, hydrophilic-hydrophobic properties, very low toxicity, dynamic surface mobility and steric stabilization) that enable these polymers to exhibit superior protein inhibiting characteristics.
- FIG. 1 is a graph showing the results of the tests described in Example 1; and
- FIG. 2 is a graph showing the results of the tests described in Example 3.
-
- wherein n is a whole number of from 10 to 3,000.
- The NIPAM polymers utilized in the present invention include various types of polymers that comprise the above-described monomer. The polymers may be formed entirely from the NIPAM monomer identified above, or other monomers can be incorporated into the polymer by copolymerizing the NIPAM monomer with other monomers, such as acrylic acid, acrylamide, N-acetylacylamide, N, N-dimethylacrylamide and butyl methacrylate. In addition, modified polymers or copolymers containing the NIPAM monomer can be prepared by functionalization of end groups, preparation of block copolymers, and cross-linking of polymers. All such polymers, copolymers or modifications thereof are referred to herein as either “NIPAM polymers” or “PNIPAM”. The NIPAM polymers utilized in the present invention will typically have molecular weights of from 1,000 to 300,000 Daltons. The polymers are available from Polymer Source, Inc., Dorval, Quebec (Canada).
- The amount of PNIPAM utilized in the compositions of the present invention will vary depending on the form of the compositions and the intended use thereof. The concentration of PNIPAM utilized will generally be an amount sufficient to obtain a solution surface tension of less than 50 milliNewtons per meter (“mNm−1”) at room temperature (23° C.).
- The above-described NIPAM polymers are surface active, and therefore will readily adsorb to most types of surfaces. Factors such as the type of surface (hydrophobic versus hydrophilic), temperature, buffer and excipients will influence the interaction between the polymers and a surface, and will influence the magnitude of the interactions.
- The above-described PNIPAM polymers may be combined with other components commonly utilized in products for treating contact lenses, such as rheology modifiers, enzymes, antimicrobial agents, surfactants, chelating agents or combinations thereof. The preferred surfactants include anionic surfactants, such as
RLM 100, and nonionic surfactants, such as the poloxamines available under the name “Tetronic®”, and the poloxamers available under the name “Pluronic®”. Furthermore, a variety of buffering agents may be added, such as sodium borate, boric acid, sodium citrate, citric acid, sodium bicarbonate, phosphate buffers and combinations thereof. - The compositions of the present invention that are intended for use as CLC products will contain one or more ophthalmically acceptable antimicrobial agents in an amount effective to prevent microbial contamination of the compositions (referred to herein as “an amount effective to preserve”), or in an amount effective to disinfect contact lenses by substantially reducing the number of viable microorganisms present on the lenses (referred to herein as “an amount effective to disinfect”).
- The levels of antimicrobial activity required to preserve ophthalmic compositions from microbial contamination or to disinfect contact lenses are well known to those skilled in the art, based both on personal experience and official, published standards, such as those set forth in the United States Pharmacopoeia (“USP”) and similar publications in other countries.
- The invention is not limited relative to the types of antimicrobial agents that may be utilized. Examples of antimicrobial agents that may be used include: chlorhexidine, polyhexamethylene biguanide polymers (“PHMB”), polyquaternium-1, and the amino biguanides described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/581,952 and corresponding International (PCT) Publication No. WO 99/32158, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated in the present specification by reference.
- The preferred antimicrobial agents are polyquaternium-1, and amino biguanides of the type described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/581,952 and corresponding International (PCT) Publication No. WO 99/32158. The most preferred amino biguanide is identified in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/581,952 as “
Compound Number 1”. This compound has the following structure: - It is referred to below by means of the code number “AL-8496”.
- The ophthalmic compositions of the present invention will generally be formulated as sterile aqueous solutions. The compositions must be formulated so as to be compatible with ophthalmic tissues and contact lens materials. The compositions will generally have an osmolality of from about 200 to about 400 milliosmoles/kilogram water (“mOsm/kg”) and a physiologically compatible pH.
- The compositions of the present invention and the ability of those compositions to reduce protein adsorption on contact lenses are further illustrated by the following Examples. Unmodified (i.e., non-ionic) NIPAM polymers and modified (i.e., end terminated with —COOH groups) NIPAM polymers were added to appropriately buffered solutions to demonstrate the ability of these polymers to reduce protein adsorption when utilized as components of buffered multi-purpose solutions for treating contact lenses. A simple means of producing PNIPAM-modified surfaces was used in order to mimic the contact lens disinfection/cleaning regime typically used by the consumer.
- The tests described below were conducted to evaluate the ability of NIPAM polymers to modify contact lens surfaces and thereby reduce protein adsorption.
- Materials/Methods
- The materials and methods utilized in the evaluation were as follows:
- Chemicals Lysozyme (Sigma, Chicken egg white,
grade 1, 3× crystalline), Trifluoroacetic Acid Anhydrous (Sigma, Protein sequencing grade) Acetonitrile (EM Science, HPLC grade), Sodium Phosphate Monobasic, Monohydrate (Sigma, ACS reagent grade), Sodium Phosphate Dibasic, Anhydrous (Sigma, ACS reagent grade), Sodium Chloride (Sigma, ultra pure grade), Unisol®4 (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., preservative-free. pH-balanced saline solution for rinsing) - The NIPAM polymers utilized are identified in Table 1 below. These polymers were purchased from Polymer Source Inc. and were used without further purification.
TABLE 1 Polymer Type Mv × 103 Mw/Mn P2991-NIPAM Non-ionic 46,380 2.36 P604-NIPAM Non-ionic 71,600 2.44 P1239-NIPAM Non-ionic 122,000 2.50 P2426F2-NIPAM- Anionic 132,000 1.29 COOH - Lenses
- Acuvue (Vistakon, a division of Johnson & Johnson Vision Products, Inc) lenses were used as the substrate in this study. The lenses had the following parameters: 42% etafilcon A, 58% water, FDA Group IV lens. Diameter, 14.0 mm; base curve, 8.8 mm; power, −2.00.
- Formulations
- The NIPAM and NIPAM-COOH polymers identified in Table 1 were formulated at pH 7.8 in a buffered vehicle containing 1.5% sorbitol, 0.6% boric acid and 0.32% NaCl. In a beaker, all the formulation chemicals except for the NIPAM polymers were weighed out and purified water was added (QS to 95%). The pH was adjusted to 7.8 with NaOH/HCl. The NIPAM polymer was weighed out and added to the buffer solution and this was stirred overnight to solubilize the polymer. The test formulations are shown in Table 2 below; the concentrations are expressed as weight/volume percent (“w/v%”):
TABLE 2 Formulation Numbers 9591-47C Component 9591-47A 9591-47B (Control) P2991-NIPAM 0.034 0.017 — Sorbitol 1.5 1.5 1.5 Boric Acid 0.6 0.6 0.6 Sodium Chloride 0.32 0.32 0.32 Purified Water QS QS QS pH 7.8 7.8 7.8 - The test formulations were evaluated for their prophylaxis behavior using lysozyme as the model protein, as described below.
- Preparation of Deposition Solution
- Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) 1.311 g of monobasic sodium phosphate (monohydrate), 5.74 g of dibasic sodium phosphate (anhydrous), and 9.0 g of sodium chloride were dissolved in deionized water and the volume was brought to 1000 mL with deionized water, and pH was adjusted (as necessary). The final concentrations of sodium phosphate and sodium chloride were 0.05 M and 0.9%, respectively. The final pH was 7.4.
- Lysozyme Solution
- A 1.5-mg/mL lysozyme solution was prepared by dissolving 750 mg of lysozyme in 500-mL phosphate buffered saline pH adjusted to 7.4.
- Lens Extraction Solution (ACNITFA)
- A lens extraction solution was prepared by mixing 1.0 ml of trifluoroacetic acid with 500-mL acetonitrile and 500 ml of deionized water. The pH of the solution ranged from 1.5 to 2.0.
- Lens Presoak Procedure
- Each lens was immersed in 3-mL of each test formulation and allowed to sit at room temperature overnight. The next morning, the lenses were removed from the test formulations and dabbed lightly on a towel.
- Lens Deposition Procedure (Physiological Deposition Model)
- Each presoaked lens was immersed in a Wheaton glass sample vial containing 3-mL of lysozyme solution. The vial was closed with a plastic snap cap and incubated in a constant temperature water bath at 37° C. for 24 hours. Three additional lenses were included as controls to establish the total amount of lysozyme deposited. After incubation, the deposited lenses were removed from their vials and rinsed by dipping into three consecutive beakers containing 200 ml Unisol®4 or water to remove any excess of the deposition solution.
- Extraction and D t rmination of Lysozym Extraction
- The lenses were extracted with 5 ml of ACN/TFA extraction solution in a screw-capped glass scintillation vial. The extraction was done by shaking the vial with a rotary shaker (Red Rotor) at room temperature for at least 2 hours (usually overnight).
- Calculations for the Determination of Lysozyme
- Quantitative determination of the lysozyme of the lens extract was carried out using a fluorescence spectrophotometer interfaced with an autosampler and a computer. The fluorescence intensity of a 2 ml aliquot from each sample solution was measured by setting the excitation/emission wavelength at 280 nm/346 nm with excitation/emission slits of 2.5 nm/10 nm, respectively, and the sensitivity of the photomultiplier was set at 950 volts.
- A lysozyme standard curve was established by diluting the lysozyme stock solution to concentrations ranging from 0 to 40 μg/ml, using the ACN/TFA extraction solution for the lens extract and the vehicle for the soaking solutions. The instrument settings for measuring the fluorescence intensity were the same for the lens extracts and lens soaking solutions.
- The lysozyme concentrations for all of the samples were calculated based on the slope developed from the linear lysozyme standard curve. The % prophylaxis of each formulation was calculated by subtracting the amount of lysozyme in the lens extract from the amount of lysozyme from the control lenses (total deposit), then dividing that by the total deposit and multiplying by 100.
- Results
- FIG. 1 shows the % prophylaxis as a function of PNIPAM concentration (g/100 ml) for nonionic NIPAM polymers having molecular weights of 46,380; 71,600; and 122,000, respectively.
- FIG. 1 shows that there was no significant PNIPAM molecular weight dependence on the % prophylaxis using the defined polymer concentrations. PNIPAM concentrations up to 0.2 g/100 ml gave % prophylaxis results of approximately 30%. With increasing PNIPAM concentrations above 0.2 g/100 ml the % prophylaxis could be increased to 50% to 60% using polymer concentrations between 0.4 g/100 ml and 0.65 g/100 ml. The % prophylaxis was not dependent is on the molecular weight of the NIPAM polymers.
- The prophylactic properties of NIPAM polymers were further evaluated using a 3-day cycling study. Two sets of lenses were prepared. One set was presoaked in the formulations shown in Table 2 before going into the lysozyme solution, whereas the other set was not. Both sets of lenses were then placed in the lysozyme solution for 8 hours (Day 1). At the end of the day all the lenses were rinsed and put in their respective formulations to soak overnight. The following day (Day 2), the lenses went back into the lysozyme for the day (8 hours). This was repeated to complete 3 cycles (3 Days). At the end of the experiment all the lenses were analyzed in accordance with the procedures described in Example 1. The results are presented in Table 3:
TABLE 3 Uptake Amount of Lysozyme Removed Sample (ug/lens) sd (ug/lens) % Prophylaxis sd 9591-47A(PS) 124.1 9.1 261.9 67.8 0.8 9591-47B(PS) 151.5 3.9 234.5 60.8 0.6 9591-47C(PS) 386.0 6.1 — — — 9591-47A 206.3 2.7 174.9 45.9 1.2 9591-47B 221.3 10.4 159.9 41.9 0.9 9591-47C 381.2 7.1 — — — - The results demonstrate that the buffered solutions containing a NIPAM polymer (i.e., P2991-NIPAM) were effective in reducing protein uptake in both the presoaked and non-presoaked lenses. For example, the presoaked lenses treated with solutions containing concentrations of 0.034% and 0.017% of the NIPAM polymer demonstrated prophylaxis values of 67.8% and 60.8%, respectively. For the non-presoaked lenses the prophylaxis values were 45.9% and 41.9% at concentrations of 0.034% and 0.017%, respectively.
- The results set forth in Table 3 demonstrate that treatment of the lenses with a NIPAM polymer solution prior to exposure to proteins is preferable. However, the results also show that even when the lenses have already been exposed to proteins prior to an initial treatment with a NIPAM polymer solution, the uptake of protein is reduced when the lenses are subsequently treated with a NIPAM polymer solution. Thus, the results of this study confirm that the compositions of the present invention are effective in reducing the formation of protein deposits on contact lenses, even when the lenses are repeatedly exposed to protein contamination.
- The prophylaxis work was extended to formulations containing the antimicrobial agent AL-8496 with unmodified NIPAM (non-ionic) and modified NIPAM (end functionalized with COOH) polymers. The formulations evaluated are shown in Table 4, below:
TABLE 4 Formulations for Microbiology Evaluation of PNIPAM Formulations Containing A Contact Lens Disinfecting Agent (AL-8496) Formulation Numbers 9591-44I Component 9591-44B 9591-44C 9591-44D 9591-44E 9591-44F (Control) P2991-NIPAM 0.087 0.21 P2426F2- 0.040 0.10 0.25 NIPAMCOOH AL-8496* 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 Tetronic ® 13040.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Sorbitol 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Sodium borate 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Sodium citrate 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Propylene glycol 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Disodium edetate 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 pH 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 % Prophylaxis 37.4 ± 0.2 54.1 ± 1.0 51.0 ± 0.5 57.3 ± 0.4 62.8 ± 1.2 0.6 ± 0.0 - The procedures utilized were the same as in Example 1. FIG. 2 shows the prophylaxis data obtained using the overnight soak model with lenses pre-soaked in the respective PNIPAM formulations.
- FIG. 2 shows that the prophylaxis properties of the NIPAM polymers were retained in the presence of the antimicrobial agent AL-8496 and other formulation components, including cleaning ingredients (e.g., citrate and Tetronic® 1304). The data demonstrate that both unmodified and modified NIPAM polymers can be incorporated into multi-purpose contact lens care formulations without compromising the prophylactic properties of the polymers.
- The disinfection activity of the formulations shown in Table 4 above was also evaluated. The results are shown in Table 5 below.
TABLE 5 Disinfection Properties of PNIPAM Formulations containing AL-8496 Time 9591- 9591- 9591- 9591- 9591- 9591- Microorganism (hrs) 44B 44C 44D 44E 44F 44I Candida 6 2.8 3.0 3.0 3.4 3.2 3.0 albicans 24 3.9 4.5 6.0 6.0 5.3 6.0 Serratia 6 2.7 6.2 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.6 marcescens 24 5.5 6.2 5.5 6.2 5.5 4.9 Staphylococcus 6 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.4 4.3 4.9 aureus 24 6.2 5.0 6.2 6.2 6.2 5.2 - The results demonstrate that the NIPAM polymers did not adversely affect the antimicrobial activity of the antimicrobial agent AL-8496.
- Several formulations were evaluated to compare the prophylaxis properties of PNIPAM with two well-known block co-polymers, Tetronic® 1107 and Pluronic® F127. The formulation components and prophylaxis results are given in Table 6, below.
- The evaluation was carried out using the same procedures as outlined in Example 1. The buffered solution utilized as a control (10581-85J) did not exhibit any prophylaxis properties. However, as shown in Table 6, the compositions of the present invention containing PNIPAM at concentrations of 0.2% (10581-85B) and 0.4% (10581-85C) produced prophylaxis results of 56.2% and 63%, respectively.
- In contrast, the solutions containing Tetronic® 1107 and Pluronic® F127 block co-polymers at concentrations of up to 0.8% did not produce any significant prophylaxis.
TABLE 6 10581- 10581- 10581- 10581- 10581- 10581- 10581- Components 85B 85C 85E 85F 85H 85I 85J PNIPAM P2991 0.2 0.4 — — — — — Tetronic ® 1107 — — 0.4 0.8 — — — Pluronic ® F127 — — — — 0.4 0.8 — Sorbitol 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Boric Acid 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Sodium Chloride 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 Purified Water QS QS QS QS QS QS QS pH 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 % Prophylaxis 56.2 + 0.1 63.0 + 0.4 0.00 + 2.3 4.1 + 2.2 0.0 + 2.1 0.0 + 0.9 0.8 + 1.0
Claims (4)
1. Use of NIPAM polymers to reduce protein adsorption on the surfaces of medial devices.
2. Use of NIPAM polymers to reduce protein adsorption on the surfaces of contact lenses.
3. A composition for reducing the formation of protein deposits on the surfaces of medical devices, comprising on effective amount of a NIPAM polymer.
4. A composition according to claim 3 , wherein the composition is adapted for the treatment of contact lenses.
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/732,934 US20040131870A1 (en) | 2002-12-23 | 2003-12-11 | Compositions and methods for inhibiting protein on surfaces |
US11/273,778 US7276552B2 (en) | 2002-12-23 | 2005-11-15 | Compositions and methods for inhibiting protein on surfaces |
US11/839,932 US7468344B2 (en) | 2002-12-23 | 2007-08-16 | Compositions and methods for inhibiting protein on surfaces |
US12/127,050 US7485607B2 (en) | 2002-12-23 | 2008-05-27 | Compositions and methods for inhibiting protein on surfaces |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US43615902P | 2002-12-23 | 2002-12-23 | |
US10/732,934 US20040131870A1 (en) | 2002-12-23 | 2003-12-11 | Compositions and methods for inhibiting protein on surfaces |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/273,778 Continuation US7276552B2 (en) | 2002-12-23 | 2005-11-15 | Compositions and methods for inhibiting protein on surfaces |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20040131870A1 true US20040131870A1 (en) | 2004-07-08 |
Family
ID=32713057
Family Applications (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/732,934 Abandoned US20040131870A1 (en) | 2002-12-23 | 2003-12-11 | Compositions and methods for inhibiting protein on surfaces |
US11/273,778 Expired - Lifetime US7276552B2 (en) | 2002-12-23 | 2005-11-15 | Compositions and methods for inhibiting protein on surfaces |
US11/839,932 Expired - Lifetime US7468344B2 (en) | 2002-12-23 | 2007-08-16 | Compositions and methods for inhibiting protein on surfaces |
US12/127,050 Expired - Lifetime US7485607B2 (en) | 2002-12-23 | 2008-05-27 | Compositions and methods for inhibiting protein on surfaces |
Family Applications After (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/273,778 Expired - Lifetime US7276552B2 (en) | 2002-12-23 | 2005-11-15 | Compositions and methods for inhibiting protein on surfaces |
US11/839,932 Expired - Lifetime US7468344B2 (en) | 2002-12-23 | 2007-08-16 | Compositions and methods for inhibiting protein on surfaces |
US12/127,050 Expired - Lifetime US7485607B2 (en) | 2002-12-23 | 2008-05-27 | Compositions and methods for inhibiting protein on surfaces |
Country Status (16)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (4) | US20040131870A1 (en) |
EP (2) | EP1938846B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2006515685A (en) |
KR (2) | KR20050086939A (en) |
CN (1) | CN100346846C (en) |
AR (1) | AR042633A1 (en) |
AT (2) | ATE481117T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2003296443B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BR0317689A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2508282C (en) |
DE (2) | DE60319133T2 (en) |
DK (1) | DK1938846T3 (en) |
ES (3) | ES2298629T3 (en) |
HK (2) | HK1076261A1 (en) |
TW (1) | TWI354021B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2004060429A1 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060063930A1 (en) * | 2004-08-20 | 2006-03-23 | Agoston Gregory E | Compositions and methods comprising proteinase activated receptor antagonists |
US20070282032A1 (en) * | 2002-12-23 | 2007-12-06 | Ketelson Howard A | Compositions and methods for inhibiting protein on surfaces |
US20170089931A1 (en) * | 2014-06-12 | 2017-03-30 | The Industry & Academic Cooperation In Chungnam National University | METHOD FOR CELL-FREE PROTEIN SYNTHESIS INVOLVED WITH pH CONTROL BY USING ENZYME |
Families Citing this family (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2008007790A1 (en) * | 2006-07-14 | 2008-01-17 | Tomey Co., Ltd. | Liquid agent for contact lens and method for hydrophilizing contact lens by using the same |
US7968650B2 (en) | 2006-10-31 | 2011-06-28 | Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. | Polymeric compositions comprising at least one volume excluding polymer |
US20090171049A1 (en) * | 2007-12-27 | 2009-07-02 | Linhardt Jeffrey G | Segmented reactive block copolymers |
US20090295004A1 (en) * | 2008-06-02 | 2009-12-03 | Pinsly Jeremy B | Silicone hydrogel contact lenses displaying reduced protein uptake |
US8534031B2 (en) * | 2008-12-30 | 2013-09-17 | Bausch & Lomb Incorporated | Packaging solutions |
US8240849B2 (en) | 2009-03-31 | 2012-08-14 | Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. | Free form lens with refractive index variations |
WO2014165582A1 (en) * | 2013-04-03 | 2014-10-09 | Southern Research Institute | Articles and methods related to transdermal delivery of a therapeutic agent |
KR101599916B1 (en) | 2014-06-10 | 2016-03-04 | 동신대학교산학협력단 | Hydrogel contact lens inhibiting protein adsorption and method for preparing the same |
Citations (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4411932A (en) * | 1981-11-23 | 1983-10-25 | Alcon Laboratories, Inc. | Method for the prevention of soilant deposits on contact lenses |
US5720976A (en) * | 1996-01-30 | 1998-02-24 | Korea Advanced Institute Of Science And Technology | Thermosensitive liposome and process for preparing the same |
US5998588A (en) * | 1995-09-01 | 1999-12-07 | University Of Washington | Interactive molecular conjugates |
US6096138A (en) * | 1997-04-30 | 2000-08-01 | Bausch & Lomb Incorporated | Method for inhibiting the deposition of protein on contact lens |
US6153568A (en) * | 1997-11-12 | 2000-11-28 | Mccanna; David J. | Compositions comprising polyquaterniums in combination with polymeric biguanides for disinfecting contact lenses |
US6270903B1 (en) * | 1998-03-06 | 2001-08-07 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Method of bonding functional surface materials to substrates and applications in microtechnology and anti-fouling |
US6274133B1 (en) * | 1998-12-22 | 2001-08-14 | Bausch & Lomb Incorporated | Method for treating extended-wear contact lenses in the eyes |
US20020004466A1 (en) * | 1999-09-24 | 2002-01-10 | Erning Xia | High osmolyte cleaning and disinfection method and solution for contact lenses |
US6426086B1 (en) * | 1998-02-03 | 2002-07-30 | The Regents Of The University Of California | pH-sensitive, serum-stable liposomes |
US6447897B1 (en) * | 1998-03-06 | 2002-09-10 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Temperature sensitive surfaces and methods of making same |
US6486213B1 (en) * | 1994-03-04 | 2002-11-26 | University Of Washington | Block and graft copolymers and methods relating thereto |
US6494861B1 (en) * | 1997-01-15 | 2002-12-17 | Boston Scientific Corporation | Drug delivery system |
US6582926B1 (en) * | 1999-03-19 | 2003-06-24 | Duke University | Methods of using bioelastomers |
US20030175410A1 (en) * | 2002-03-18 | 2003-09-18 | Campbell Phil G. | Method and apparatus for preparing biomimetic scaffold |
US6664294B1 (en) * | 1997-12-19 | 2003-12-16 | Alcon Manufacturing, Ltd. | Aminobiguanides and the use thereof to disinfect contact lenses and preserve pharmaceutical compositions |
Family Cites Families (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4452925A (en) * | 1981-02-09 | 1984-06-05 | National Patent Development Corporation | Biologically stabilized compositions comprising collagen as the minor component with ethylenically unsaturated compounds used as contact lenses |
US4388428A (en) * | 1981-07-20 | 1983-06-14 | National Patent Development Corporation | Biologically stabilized compositions comprising collagen as the major component with ethylenically unsaturated compounds used as contact lenses |
JPH0519213A (en) * | 1991-07-10 | 1993-01-29 | Seiko Epson Corp | Production of contact lens |
JPH0580276A (en) * | 1991-09-24 | 1993-04-02 | Seiko Epson Corp | Contact lens |
JP3085480B2 (en) * | 1991-10-02 | 2000-09-11 | セイコーエプソン株式会社 | Hormone controlled release contact lens |
JPH05285164A (en) * | 1992-04-03 | 1993-11-02 | Unitika Ltd | Antithrombotic intraocular lens |
JP3324156B2 (en) * | 1992-10-12 | 2002-09-17 | セイコーエプソン株式会社 | contact lens |
JPH10333103A (en) * | 1997-05-28 | 1998-12-18 | Mitsuru Akashi | Eye lens having adaptability for living body and production of eye lens having adaptability for living body |
JP2001256075A (en) * | 2000-03-13 | 2001-09-21 | Nec Software Hokuriku Ltd | Developing system and developing method and recording medium |
DE10145910A1 (en) * | 2000-09-18 | 2002-06-20 | Registrar University Of Delhi | Ophthalmic formulation with slowed release and long residence time as well as manufacturing processes therefor |
DK1362240T3 (en) * | 2000-10-10 | 2007-01-29 | Serono Genetics Inst Sa | Surface adsorbing polymers and their applications in the treatment of hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces |
US20020155241A1 (en) * | 2001-02-26 | 2002-10-24 | Tarasevich Barbara J. | Surface modifications of medical devices to reduce protein adsorption |
JP3838882B2 (en) * | 2001-02-28 | 2006-10-25 | 株式会社Phg | Temperature-responsive material and composition containing the same |
WO2002085425A1 (en) * | 2001-04-20 | 2002-10-31 | Medtronic, Inc. | Enhanced chronic lead removal |
BR0313726A (en) * | 2002-08-09 | 2005-06-14 | Ottawa Health Research Inst | Biosynthetic Matrix and Jobs of this |
TWI354021B (en) | 2002-12-23 | 2011-12-11 | Alcon Inc | Compositions and methods for inhibiting protein on |
-
2003
- 2003-11-07 TW TW92131215A patent/TWI354021B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2003-12-11 AT AT08002333T patent/ATE481117T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2003-12-11 DK DK08002333T patent/DK1938846T3/en active
- 2003-12-11 WO PCT/US2003/039250 patent/WO2004060429A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2003-12-11 KR KR1020057011884A patent/KR20050086939A/en active Search and Examination
- 2003-12-11 ES ES03814697T patent/ES2298629T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2003-12-11 DE DE2003619133 patent/DE60319133T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2003-12-11 EP EP08002333A patent/EP1938846B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2003-12-11 US US10/732,934 patent/US20040131870A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-12-11 ES ES08002333T patent/ES2350378T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2003-12-11 CN CNB2003801074303A patent/CN100346846C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2003-12-11 AT AT03814697T patent/ATE385813T1/en active
- 2003-12-11 CA CA2508282A patent/CA2508282C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2003-12-11 BR BR0317689A patent/BR0317689A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2003-12-11 AU AU2003296443A patent/AU2003296443B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2003-12-11 DE DE60334255T patent/DE60334255D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2003-12-11 KR KR1020127009256A patent/KR20120059618A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2003-12-11 EP EP20030814697 patent/EP1575634B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2003-12-11 JP JP2004565332A patent/JP2006515685A/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2003-12-19 AR ARP030104753 patent/AR042633A1/en unknown
-
2005
- 2005-09-26 HK HK05108470A patent/HK1076261A1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2005-11-15 US US11/273,778 patent/US7276552B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2007
- 2007-08-16 US US11/839,932 patent/US7468344B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2008
- 2008-05-27 US US12/127,050 patent/US7485607B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2008-10-20 HK HK08111580A patent/HK1116712A1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2008-11-11 ES ES08019648T patent/ES2350379T3/en active Active
Patent Citations (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4411932A (en) * | 1981-11-23 | 1983-10-25 | Alcon Laboratories, Inc. | Method for the prevention of soilant deposits on contact lenses |
US6486213B1 (en) * | 1994-03-04 | 2002-11-26 | University Of Washington | Block and graft copolymers and methods relating thereto |
US5998588A (en) * | 1995-09-01 | 1999-12-07 | University Of Washington | Interactive molecular conjugates |
US5720976A (en) * | 1996-01-30 | 1998-02-24 | Korea Advanced Institute Of Science And Technology | Thermosensitive liposome and process for preparing the same |
US6323165B1 (en) * | 1996-05-13 | 2001-11-27 | Bausch & Lomb Incorporated | Composition and method for inhibiting of protein on contact lens |
US6494861B1 (en) * | 1997-01-15 | 2002-12-17 | Boston Scientific Corporation | Drug delivery system |
US6096138A (en) * | 1997-04-30 | 2000-08-01 | Bausch & Lomb Incorporated | Method for inhibiting the deposition of protein on contact lens |
US6153568A (en) * | 1997-11-12 | 2000-11-28 | Mccanna; David J. | Compositions comprising polyquaterniums in combination with polymeric biguanides for disinfecting contact lenses |
US6664294B1 (en) * | 1997-12-19 | 2003-12-16 | Alcon Manufacturing, Ltd. | Aminobiguanides and the use thereof to disinfect contact lenses and preserve pharmaceutical compositions |
US6426086B1 (en) * | 1998-02-03 | 2002-07-30 | The Regents Of The University Of California | pH-sensitive, serum-stable liposomes |
US6447897B1 (en) * | 1998-03-06 | 2002-09-10 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Temperature sensitive surfaces and methods of making same |
US6270903B1 (en) * | 1998-03-06 | 2001-08-07 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Method of bonding functional surface materials to substrates and applications in microtechnology and anti-fouling |
US6274133B1 (en) * | 1998-12-22 | 2001-08-14 | Bausch & Lomb Incorporated | Method for treating extended-wear contact lenses in the eyes |
US6582926B1 (en) * | 1999-03-19 | 2003-06-24 | Duke University | Methods of using bioelastomers |
US20020004466A1 (en) * | 1999-09-24 | 2002-01-10 | Erning Xia | High osmolyte cleaning and disinfection method and solution for contact lenses |
US20030175410A1 (en) * | 2002-03-18 | 2003-09-18 | Campbell Phil G. | Method and apparatus for preparing biomimetic scaffold |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070282032A1 (en) * | 2002-12-23 | 2007-12-06 | Ketelson Howard A | Compositions and methods for inhibiting protein on surfaces |
US20080220149A1 (en) * | 2002-12-23 | 2008-09-11 | Howard Allen Ketelson | Compositions and methods for inhibiting protein on surfaces |
US7468344B2 (en) | 2002-12-23 | 2008-12-23 | Alcon, Inc. | Compositions and methods for inhibiting protein on surfaces |
US7485607B2 (en) | 2002-12-23 | 2009-02-03 | Alcon, Inc. | Compositions and methods for inhibiting protein on surfaces |
US20060063930A1 (en) * | 2004-08-20 | 2006-03-23 | Agoston Gregory E | Compositions and methods comprising proteinase activated receptor antagonists |
US20170089931A1 (en) * | 2014-06-12 | 2017-03-30 | The Industry & Academic Cooperation In Chungnam National University | METHOD FOR CELL-FREE PROTEIN SYNTHESIS INVOLVED WITH pH CONTROL BY USING ENZYME |
US10088493B2 (en) * | 2014-06-12 | 2018-10-02 | The Industry & Academic Cooperation In Chungnam National University | Method for cell-free protein synthesis involved with pH control with amino acid decarboxylase |
Also Published As
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7485607B2 (en) | Compositions and methods for inhibiting protein on surfaces | |
US10584307B2 (en) | Use of PEO-PBO block copolymers in ophthalmic compositions | |
US7105473B2 (en) | Compositions and methods using sub-PPM combinations of polyquaternium-1 and high molecular weight PHMB | |
EP0180309B2 (en) | Improved disinfecting and preserving solutions for contact lenses and methods of use | |
EP1346021B1 (en) | Prevention of preservative uptake into ophthalmic lenses | |
JP2001522673A (en) | Disinfection of contact lenses using polyquaternium and polymerized biguanides | |
KR20050083693A (en) | Compositions with enhanced antimicrobial efficacy against acanthamoebae | |
US6528464B1 (en) | Composition and method for inhibiting uptake of biguanide antimicrobials by hydrogels | |
US20100178317A1 (en) | Lens Care Solutions with Hyaluronic Acid | |
US7282178B2 (en) | Composition and method for cleaning lipid deposits on contact lenses | |
EP2664665B1 (en) | Ophthalmic compositions with biguanide and PEG-glycerol esters | |
AU2013200591B2 (en) | Use of peo-pbo block copolymers in ophthalmic compositions |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ALCON, INC., SWITZERLAND Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KETELSON, HOWARD ALLEN;REEL/FRAME:014817/0234 Effective date: 20031211 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |